As they go extinct, perhaps some new names for them are in order:
IllumiLie
IllumiBlockI
IllumiBlob
IllumiBlahI
IllumiBlah
I think that alive or dead, each should be placed into a separate Physical Torture Cube that will survive the Sun's nova (move them to a rock outside Jupiter's orbit).
Saturday, November 21, 2015
Sunday, August 30, 2015
Absolute proof of Quora locking out viewership to certain questions...
3 people have viewed this question in 4 hours. Those topics have about 1 million members. This is impossible to explain in any other way, than someone (hackers? NSA?) are actively controlling who sees which questions.
https://www.quora.com/What-if-we-locked-down-all-databases-to-a-single-interface-Would-this-go-a-long-way-towards-securing-the-data-see-notes
https://www.quora.com/What-if-we-locked-down-all-databases-to-a-single-interface-Would-this-go-a-long-way-towards-securing-the-data-see-notes
Sunday, August 23, 2015
Unusual traffic on Quora...
Notice the odd statistics on my Quora answers, see attached screenshot.
How could the spikes be equidistant (3 months + 4 days)?
Thursday, August 6, 2015
IRS levy on Social Security payments
The IRS is illegally levying Social Security payments up to 15% per month.
Title 26 Section 6331 (h)(2)
(A)any Federal payment other than a payment for which eligibility is based on the income or assets (or both) of a payee,
So, 6331 specifically EXEMPTS Social Security payments. If you know of someone affected, I am considering a class-action lawsuit.
My original post:
Section 207 of the Social Security Act clearly defines social security payments as exempt from levy and garnishment. Some assert that Section 1024 of PL 105-34 Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 overrides the Social Security Act. The reference is: (h) Continuing Levy on Certain Payments where "certain payments" is defined in section: (A) any Federal payment other than a payment for which eligibility is based on the income or assets (or both) of a payee.
As the eligibility for Social Security AND Social Security Disability payments are both based on income, it is clear those payments are exempt from the "Continuing Levy on Certain Payments".
Further, as the title of the Act is "Taxpayer Relief Act", it is apparent that the overall intent of the Act was to relieve the taxpayer and not be used to increase collections.
Title 26 Section 6331 (h)(2)
(A)any Federal payment other than a payment for which eligibility is based on the income or assets (or both) of a payee,
So, 6331 specifically EXEMPTS Social Security payments. If you know of someone affected, I am considering a class-action lawsuit.
My original post:
Section 207 of the Social Security Act clearly defines social security payments as exempt from levy and garnishment. Some assert that Section 1024 of PL 105-34 Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 overrides the Social Security Act. The reference is: (h) Continuing Levy on Certain Payments where "certain payments" is defined in section: (A) any Federal payment other than a payment for which eligibility is based on the income or assets (or both) of a payee.
As the eligibility for Social Security AND Social Security Disability payments are both based on income, it is clear those payments are exempt from the "Continuing Levy on Certain Payments".
Further, as the title of the Act is "Taxpayer Relief Act", it is apparent that the overall intent of the Act was to relieve the taxpayer and not be used to increase collections.
Public Law 105-34 Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)